Legal Opinion

Hance v. Pacific Express Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1896PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Lincoln Circuit Court. — Hon. E. M. Hughes, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

This is the second time this cause has been before us. 48 Mo. App. 179. On the first trial the circuit court peremptorily instructed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant. We held that to be error, and reversed the judgment and remanded the cause. The leading or controlling facts, and the law applicable thereto, are fully stated in our former opinion, and we need only note in this opinion the difference, if any, in the evidence of the two trials, and determine whether the case has been retried according to our former rulings.

On the twenty-third day of May, 1889, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hance v. Pacific Express Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. Wabash RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Lachner Bros. v. Adams Express Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Bartelt v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Foust v. LeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Griffin v. Wabash RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API