Legal Opinion

Fugett v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 1, 1993No. 2-92-064-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HILL, Chief Justice.

George Washington Fugett appeals his conviction by a jury of the offense of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon, a bat. Upon Fugett’s plea of true to the enhancement and habitual counts of his indictment, the trial court assessed his punishment at forty years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.

Fugett contends in five points of error that: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support the finding that a deadly weapon was used or exhibited during the course of the offense and is insufficient to convict him under the law of parties;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Bonham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Harrington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Matthews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Daniel Lee Boss v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995
  2. Emilio J. Maldonado v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2013
  3. George Edward Dann v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  4. Larry Collins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  5. Larry Collins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API