Legal Opinion

Eisenberg v. Central Zone Property Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In confirming the report of the Referee appointed by it, Special Term allowed plaintiff $25,000 for legal services rendered by him in connection with the prosecution of two derivative actions which he brought as a minority stockholder of the defendant corporation. Plaintiff appeals from the order on the grounds that the allowance was inadequate, that interest thereon should not be limited and that the condition of payment awaiting the outcome of the litigation was improper; defendant, on the ground that no allowance was justified.

The defendant real-estate corporation had proposed a plan of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Eisenberg v. Central Zone Property Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Martin Foundation, Inc. v. Phillips-Jones Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  4. Martin Foundation, Inc. v. Phillips-Jones Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Martin Foundation, Inc. v. Phillips-Jones Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers, Local Union No. 701Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Clark v. Lomas & Nettleton Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1978
  3. Mautner v. HirschDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  4. Gilbert v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers, Local Union No. 701Oregon Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API