Legal Opinion

Holt v. McCasky

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1855PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Titus.

1Opinion of the Court

Hemphill, Ch. J.

This case was brought from a Justice’s Court into the District Court by a writ of certiorari. At the first Term, it was continued by the plaintiff. At the second, it was dismissed on motion of the defendant; and this judgment has, by writ of error, been brought up to this Court.

The principal ground assigned for reversal is, that the motion to dismiss, not being filed at the return Term of the certiorari, came too late, and for that reason should have been overruled. And there is no doubt, under the decisions of this Court, that this is a valid ground of objection to the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parker Motor Co. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1884
  3. Walker v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API