Legal Opinion

People v. Sirinsky

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 20, 1969No. Gen. 52,583PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Defendant was found guilty at a bench trial of the operation of a motor vehicle on a public street while under the influence of intoxicating beverage. He received a fine of $100 and was assessed costs in the amount of $5. His contention on this appeal is that the complaint under which he was found guilty was defective in that it was brought in the name of the City of Evanston for a violation of the Illinois Uniform Act to Regulate Traffic (UART). He maintains that he was not sufficiently informed of the charges he was to face and that the defect in the caption of the complaint resulted in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Admiral Oasis Hotel Corp. v. Home Gas Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  2. The PEOPLE v. TammenIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. The People v. PetrusoIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. StringfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  5. City of Chicago v. BergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE v. SirinskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. AllenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. City of O'Fallon v. ReynoldsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API