Legal Opinion

Holman-Baker Co. v. Pre-Design, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 3, 1962No. 4999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

In the world of credit there is emerging a rule, consistent with modern business practices, under which a principal is bound by the promise of his general agent, whether or not authorized, when such promise is made within the scope of the agent’s power. Mearns, Vicarious Liability for Agency Contracts, 48 Va. L. Rev. 50 (1962). The rule has been developed and nur tured over some period of time by an eminent authority. Seavey, The Rationale of Agency, 29 Yale L. J. 859 (1920) and Agency Powers, 1 Okla. L. Rev. 3 (1948) reprinted in Seavey, Studies in Agency 181 (1949). The rationale of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brooks v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Coca-Cola USAUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Garland v. FleischmannUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Moore v. Dover Veterinary Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  4. New Hampshire Bituminous Co. v. TAB Aviation, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  5. Garland v. FleischmannUtah Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API