Huffstedler v. Swan
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mb. Chibe Justice Green
delivered the opinion of the Court.
Prom a decree rendered on a pro confesso against him the defendant Boyd has appealed and assigns for error that the pro confesso was improperly entered. We think his contention is correct.
The bill was filed by complainant against J. A. Swan, W. D. Boyd and W. H. Swan, November 28, 1925. ■ The Swan’s accepted service of process. A subpoena issued for defendant Boyd returnable to the first Monday in December (7th), 1925. It was returned December 2, 1925, “not found.” Alias process for defendant Boyd issued December 4, 1925, returnable to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tipton v. TiptonTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
- Wessells v. WessellsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1872
3Cited by1 opinion
- Beebe v. AyresNew York Supreme Court · 1858