Legal Opinion
Norwich Savings Society v. Caldrello
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 22, 1995No. 13572PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHennessy, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of foreclosure by sale and the judgment in favor of the plaintiff bank on the defendant’s counterclaim. The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) granted the motions to strike his special defenses, (2) failed to find a violation of General Statutes § 42-110a et seq., the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), and (3) concluded that a secret *861extension of the terms of a loan did not materially harm the defendant. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court found the following facts relevant to this appeal. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- McLaughlin Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brinson v. Finlay Bros. Printing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Currie v. the Aetna Casualty Surety Co., No. Cv-96-0558900 (Aug. 12, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Delaney v. Warren, No. 0126588 (Jun. 4, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996
- Nacca v. Simione, No. Cv 96-0387221 (May 28, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Norwich Savings Society v. CaldrelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.