Gilbert v. Pier
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Lincoln county: EraNK M. Pish, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. Por the respondent there was a brief by Brown & Pradt, attorneys, and Frcmldin E. Bump, of counsel, and oral argument by Weal Brown.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Lincoln county: EraNK M. Pish, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. Por the respondent there was a brief by Brown & Pradt, attorneys, and Frcmldin E. Bump, of counsel, and oral argument by Weal Brown. To the point that the statutes under consideration are in pari materia and, though enacted at different times, should be construed together as though they constituted one act, they cited Sutherland, Stat. Const. §§ 283, 284, and cases cited; St. Louis v. Howm'd, 119 Mo. 41; S. 0. 41 Am. St. Rep. 630; State v. Atkinson, 88 Wis. 1; State ex…
1Opinion of the CourtWiNsnow, J.
The amount involved upon this appeal is less than $100, and the case comes here upon certificate of the trial judge. It appears from the certificate that the action is one of ejectment by the original owner against the holder of tax-title deeds based on the tax sales of 1891 and 1892, and that the tax deeds were held void on account of irregularities not going to the groundwork of the tax, whereupon judgment was ordered for the plaintiff upon condition that he pay into court, within ninety days, the amount of the unpaid taxes paid by the defendant, with interest thereon at fifteen per cent,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Herbst v. Land & Loan Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Washburn Land Co. v. SwanbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907