Legal Opinion

Dibble v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1992No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: The order is modified by deleting the provision granting third-party defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to provide authorization for all of plaintiff’s workers’ compensation records and medical records. The CPLR does not contain any provision that would allow third-party defendant to obtain authorization from plaintiff to allow it access to plaintiff’s workers’ compensation records (see, CPLR 3102 [a]; see also, Hinrichs v Tonnssen, 128 Misc 2d 196; Bennett v…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. MartocheNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hinrichs v. TonnssenNew York Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Primeau v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Beutel v. GuildAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API