Legal Opinion

Villavisencio v. Saul

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 8, 2022No. 5:20-cv-06620Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 M.V., Case No. 20-cv-06620-VKD 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 10 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES 11 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendant. 12 13 14 Plaintiff M.V. appealed a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 15 (“Commissioner”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental 16 security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“Act”),

42 U.S.C. §§ 423, 17 1381, et seq. The sole issue presented concerned M.V.’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Saluja Thangaraja v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Smith v. Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade & Consumer ProtectionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API