Legal Opinion

Pitman v. Mercer

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1929No. 5263PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge LEDDY

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

This is an original proceeding in which the relator seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, Hon. James E. Mercer, Judge of the 67th Judicial District, to set aside the verdict and judgment rendered in said court in the case of Mrs. Mazzie Pitman v. Carb Building Company.

The Carb Building Company, defendant in above cause, was granted leave to intervene herein, as it was made to appear that its rights would be affected if the writ prayed for should be granted.

Relator bases her right to a writ of mandamus…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Teat v. McGaugheyTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Davis v. TerrellTexas Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Edwards v. TerrellTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Schell v. TerrellTexas Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Walton v. ChristmasWyoming Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API