Legal Opinion
Natural Resources Corp. v. Royal Resources Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 28, 1977No. 75 Civ. 5900PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Defendant Royal Resources Corporation (“Royal”) moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c), Fed.R. Civ.P., or, in the alternative, for summary judgment under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., on the grounds that this action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Because affidavits and exhibits have been furnished to the Court, the motion will be treated as one for summary judgment. For the reasons hereinafter stated, defendant’s motion is granted.
Natural Resources Corporation (“NRC”) brings this action against Royal to recover damages…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Edward M. Stafford and Peggie Ann Stafford v. International Harvester Company and Eastco Truck Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Simon v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- Turner v. First Wisconsin Mortgage TrustDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1978
- Freschi v. Grand Coal VentureDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.