Legal Opinion

TAIJUIAN HENSON v. UNITED STATES

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 13, 2015No. 13-CF-808PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Senior Judge:

After pleading guilty to possession with intent to distribute (“PWID”) cocaine and additional charges, appellant Taijuian Henson moved to withdraw his plea on the basis that his prior appointed counsel, James Williams, Esq., ineffectively failed to apprise him of an earlier, more beneficial, plea offer. That motion was denied by the trial court, and forms the basis of his present appeal. Henson now argues that the trial court improperly weighed Williams’ ineffectiveness and erred in concluding that even if Williams had performed deficiently, Henson would not have taken…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Missouri v. FryeSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Ford v. ChartOne, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Gooding v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paz Cruz v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Paz Cruz v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API