Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Accardi v. Shaughnessy

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 7, 1955No. 97, Docket 23191PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. We shall assume familiarity with the facts stated in our previous opinion, 2 Cir., 206 F.2d 897, and in the opinion of the Supreme Court, 347 U.S. 260, 74 S.Ct. 499, 98 L.Ed. 681. We do stress one fact: The particular kind of discretionary relief sought by Accardi was suspension of deportation, pursuant to Section 19(c) of the Immigration Act of 1917, as amended in 1948,* which, so far as pertinent, provides:

“In the case of any alien (other than one to whom subsection (d) is applicable) who is deportable under any law of the United States and who has proved good moral…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. United States v. Oregon State Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API