Roosa v. Davis
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Bill in equity, to redeem certain real estate in that part of Newton called West Newton from a mortgage, and to set aside as irregular and invalid an attempted foreclosure of the same. A decree was entered for the plaintiff in the Superior Court; and she appealed to this conrt. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLathrop, J.
By the decree of the Superior Court the plaintiff was given the right to redeem the premises from the foreclosure of the mortgage held by the defendants, by paying to them, on or before May 19, 1899, the sum of $2,948.30, with interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from May 1,1898, to the day of such redemption, together with the defendants’ costs, to be taxed at one half the taxable costs as taxed by the clerk. The case is before us on an appeal from this decree, the plaintiff contending that the amount which she is required to pay is too large.
The case was heard by a master, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Popple v. DayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gray v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Huntress v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Hillier v. FarrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Capen v. CapenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920