Kirshman v. Crawford-Plummer Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Crawford-Phimmer Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Trial Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 6th day of March, 1914, setting aside the verdict of a jury in plaintiff’s favor as inadequate, and granting a new trial.
Read the full summary
Appeal by the defendant, Crawford-Phimmer Company, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Trial Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 6th day of March, 1914, setting aside the verdict of a jury in plaintiff’s favor as inadequate, and granting a new trial. Appeal by the plaintiff, Harry Kirshman, doing business as Kirshman Bros., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Trial Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on or about the 10th day of March, 1914, setting aside the verdict of a jury…
1Opinion of the Court
McLaughlin, J.:
Action to recover $1,614.50 for goods sold and delivered. The defendant admits an indebtedness of $460, so that it is only necessary to consider a single item, amounting to $1,154.50.
The plaintiff is a manufacturer of ladies’ cloaks and suits in the city of New York and the defendant, a foreign corporation, is the owner of a retail ladies’ cloak and suit store in Boston, Mass. On or about April 17, 1913, an agreement was entered into between plaintiff and defendant whereby plaintiff agreed to sell and defendant to buy a certain job lot of ladies’ suits. At the trial the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nightingale v. . EisemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bank of United States v. James McCreery & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Dorfman v. Werthan Bag & Burlap Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916