Legal Opinion · Dissent

Doe v. Union Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 5, 1996No. 95-682Published

1DissentRobert L. Brown, Justice

I would accept this appeal and decide the issue under the test employed in Omni Farms, Inc. v. Arkansas Power & Light Co., 271 Ark. 61, 607 S.W.2d 363 (1980) and Gipson v. Brown, 288 Ark. 422, 706 S.W.2d 369 (1986).

What Jane Doe requested in her briefs and at oral argument is that the style of this case, as contained in the permanent record, not reflect her real name. She has made her actual name available to counsel for Dr. Ramone. She is available for discovery and will appear at trial to testify in public. Any enterprising news reporter could ferret out her real name. Her true name may…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bill W. Doe v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  2. John James Mary James v. Cecil B. Jacobson, Jr., M.D. Reproductive Genetics Center, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  3. Gipson v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Omni Farms, Inc. v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Scheland v. ChilldresSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API