Legal Opinion
Kerrigan v. Boucher
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 24, 1971No. Civ. 14153PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BLUMENF.ELD, District Judge.
When this action in forma pauperis was commenced, the plaintiff sought injunctive relief and damages in an unspecified amount. Before the case came on for hearing, plaintiff’s counsel informed the court that the plaintiff’s property which was the subject matter of this case had been returned to him and that the record should be enlarged to include that fact. In spite of this substantial resolution of the dispute, the matter is now pressed upon the court by the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, with the principal prayer…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jerome B. Hansen v. John C. Ahlgrimm and Harley BrownCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Kirksey v. TheiligDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1972
- Thomas J. Kerrigan v. Gerald A. BoucherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Musselman v. SpiesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Parks v. " MR. FORD"District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.