Legal Opinion

Bank of New York v. Vanderhorst

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1865PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The plaintiff in this action claims to recover against the defendant as maker of a promissory note, dated November 24th, 1859, for $4,400.80, payable, six months after date, to the order of Kolff & Persuhn. No question was made upon the pleadings. The action was tried before Samuel E. Lyon, Esq., referee, who, in his report, finds the following facts amongst others:

That the firm of Kolff & Persuhn was a limited partnership, doing business in the city of New York, Kolff & Persuhn being the general partners, and one Ernest Fiedler being the "special partner. That at the time the note bears…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. . NewbouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Bank of Rutland v. BuckNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. President of the Bank of Chenango v. HydeNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  4. Boyd v. . CummingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  5. Spencer v. . BallouNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Weaver v. . BardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Black v. Bank of WestminsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
  3. Lawrence v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Barrett v. TowneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Mechanics' & Traders' Bank v. LivingstonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API