Bank of New York v. Vanderhorst
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The plaintiff in this action claims to recover against the defendant as maker of a promissory note, dated November 24th, 1859, for $4,400.80, payable, six months after date, to the order of Kolff & Persuhn. No question was made upon the pleadings. The action was tried before Samuel E. Lyon, Esq., referee, who, in his report, finds the following facts amongst others:
That the firm of Kolff & Persuhn was a limited partnership, doing business in the city of New York, Kolff & Persuhn being the general partners, and one Ernest Fiedler being the "special partner. That at the time the note bears…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wheeler v. . NewbouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Bank of Rutland v. BuckNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- President of the Bank of Chenango v. HydeNew York Supreme Court · 1825
- Boyd v. . CummingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Spencer v. . BallouNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
3Cited by16 opinions
- Weaver v. . BardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Black v. Bank of WestminsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
- Lawrence v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Barrett v. TowneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Mechanics' & Traders' Bank v. LivingstonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.