City of Hollywood v. Florida Power & Light Co.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Judge.
We reverse a final judgment dismissing the City of Hollywood’s complaint for declaratory judgment. The City alleges that a controversy exists in construing the franchise agreement between the parties, reflected in a city ordinance setting out the terms of the franchise. Section 86.021, Florida Statutes, provides for a declaration of rights or status where a party to an agreement is in doubt as to rights thereunder.
The City contends that the terms of payment to the City by the franchisee constitute an illegal and unconstitutional tax exemption that the earlier commission did not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- May v. HolleySupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Harry Pepper & Associates, Inc. v. LasseterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Capital City Country Club v. TuckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Bell v. Associated Independents, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Archer v. MarshallSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Hollywood v. PetrosinoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Dye v. United Services Automobile Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
- 550 Seabreeze Development, LLC v. Illinois Union Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020
- Brodsky v. USAA General Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020
- Milani v. Palm Beach CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.