Legal Opinion
Mathew Enterprise, Inc. v. Chrysler Group LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 20, 2017No. Case No. 13-cv-04236-BLFPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
[Re: ECF 334]
BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge
Plaintiff - Mathew Enterprise, Inc., a Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge, and Ram (“CJDR”) dealer operating at Stevens Creek CJDR (“Stevens Creek”) brought this action alleging that Defendant Chrysler Group LLC (“Chrysler”) offered incentive payments to other CJDR dealers in Northern California but not to Stevens Creek in violation of § 2(a) of the Robinson-Patman Price Discrimination Act (“RPA” or “Robinson-Patman Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 13.1 On October 13, 2Ó16, after a 7-day trial, the jury found in…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- City of Pomona v. Sqm North America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Edward J. Sweeney & Sons, Inc., and Mission Gas Oil Company, Inc. And Petroleum Products Co. v. Texaco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Addison v. City of Baker CityDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2017
- Krizek v. Queens Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022