Legal Opinion

People v. Quinones

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 11, 2014No. C074081PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUARTE, J.

In this case we consider whether an arming enhancement— found true by the jury but dismissed for sentencing purposes at defendant Humberto Quinones’s original 1996 sentencing hearing — may be used to disqualify him for resentencing under Proposition 36. We conclude the answer is yes, and affirm the order denying his petition to recall his sentence under the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012 (Pen. Code, §§ 667, 1170.12, 1170.126; Prop. 36, as approved by voters, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 6, 2012) (the Act)).

BACKGROUND

A jury convicted defendant of two counts of possession for sale of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. YearwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. ShirleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Myers, California Court of Appeal, 3rd District2016
  2. P. v. Rogers CA3California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. Young CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API