Legal Opinion

Tebben v. Gil Haugan Construction, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2007No. 23847, 23848Published

1Opinion of the Court

2007 SD 18

CHERYL TEBBEN, Claimant and Appellant,

v.

GIL HAUGAN CONSTRUCTION, INC., Employer and Appellee, and

GENERAL CASUALTY, Insurer and Appellee.

Nos. 23847, 23848

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Argued February 14, 2006

Reassigned October 11, 2006

Opinion Filed February 21, 2007

JAMES G. ABOUREZK of Abourezk Law Offices, P.C. Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Attorney for appellant.

MICHAEL S. McKNIGHT, LISA HANSEN MARSO of Boyce, Greenfield, Pashby & Welk, L.L.P., Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Attorneys for employer, insurer and appellees.

KONENKAMP, Justice (on reassignment).

[¶1.] Cheryl Tebben sought…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Bridge v. Karl's, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Helms v. Lynn's, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. King v. Johnson Bros. Construction CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API