Legal Opinion

Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Public Service Com'n of Wisconsin

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided November 25, 1998No. 97-C-566-C, 98-C-11-C, 98-C-153-C and 98-C-366-CPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CRABB, District Judge.

These four civil actions are brought pursuant to the Telecommunications Act of 1996. At the heart of each lies a ruling of defendant Public Service Commission of Wisconsin issued under the auspices of the Act. In essence, the actions are appeals of the commission’s rulings. Defendants in all the cases are the commission and its members, who are named in their official capacities only. The actions are before the court on motions filed by defendants in each case to dismiss on Eleventh Amendment immunity grounds. To expedite resolution of the motions, I…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. SchachtSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Welch v. Texas Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of WisconsinDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1999
  3. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. MCIMetro Access Transmission Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000
  4. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, and MCI Metro Access Transmission Services, Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, and United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Intervenors-Appellees v. Illinois Commerce Commission, Terry Harvill, Ruth K. Kretschmer, in Their Official Capacities as Commissioners of the Il Commerce Commission, Illinois Bell Telephone Company, Doing Business as Ameritech Illinois, and United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Intervenors-Appellees v. Terry Harvill, Richard Kolhauser, Ruth K. Kretschmer, in Their Official Capacities as Commissioners of the Illinois Commerce Commission and Not as IndividualsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API