Parrish v. Parrish
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 95 Ohio St.3d 1201.] PARRISH, APPELLANT, v. PARRISH, APPELLEE. [Cite as Parrish v. Parrish,
2002-Ohio-1623.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 00-1963—Submitted October 2, 2001—Decided April 10, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Ross County, No. 98CA2470. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. RESNICK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J.,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Felton v. FeltonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Deacon v. LandersOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Parrish v. ParrishOhio Supreme Court · 2002
3Cited by4 opinions
- McGuire v. Sprinkle, Ca2006-06-069 (6-4-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Waters v. Lattany, Unpublished Decision (3-9-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- I.S. v. I.S.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Slusser v. KlostermanOhio Court of Appeals · 2009