Legal Opinion

Parrish v. Parrish

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2002No. 2000-1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 95 Ohio St.3d 1201.] PARRISH, APPELLANT, v. PARRISH, APPELLEE. [Cite as Parrish v. Parrish,

2002-Ohio-1623.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 00-1963—Submitted October 2, 2001—Decided April 10, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Ross County, No. 98CA2470. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur. RESNICK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Felton v. FeltonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Deacon v. LandersOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Parrish v. ParrishOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McGuire v. Sprinkle, Ca2006-06-069 (6-4-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Waters v. Lattany, Unpublished Decision (3-9-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. I.S. v. I.S.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Slusser v. KlostermanOhio Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API