Towns v. Monongahela Railway Co.
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lively, Judge :
Plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment of $5,000.00 for personal injuries received as an employee of defendant, and the latter prosecutes error. •
There is no material controversy of fact. The controlling question on this writ is whether plaintiff was engaged in intrastate or interstate service at the time he received his injury, and therefore whether the State or Federal law applies. Plaintiff contended that he was engaged in interstate service, and offered an instruction to that effect; while defendant contended that plaintiff was engaged toy it in intrastate service, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Erie Railroad v. WelshSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Graber v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Behrens v. Illinois Cent. R.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1911
- McKee v. Ohio Valley Electric Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Scott v. Virginian Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
- Towns v. Monongahela Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1930