Legal Opinion

Stannard v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 15, 1916No. 33044Published

1Opinion of the CourtBarnet, Judge

This suit arises out of a contract entered into by the plaintiffs as copartners for the construction of a power plant for the arsenal at Watertown, Mass.

*254Pursuant to advertisement for bids, the plaintiff Stannard made a bid for the erection of said plant, which was accepted. Before submitting his proposal said Stannard had executed an undertaking, with the Illinois Surety Company as surety, that if within ten days after notice of acceptance of his bid he should fail to enter into contract with bond and surety for the construction of said plant the said surety company would pay to the United…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bogk v. GassertSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Walker v. TuckerIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Utley v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Jones v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  5. Ricardi Apartment House Co. v. BeaudetAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API