Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Westbrook

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bek CuRIam.

Tbe plaintiff’s production of tbe draft in tbe trial was evidence of its nonpayment by tbe drawer. It contained a waiver of protest which was binding upon all parties — a waiver of formal protest, of presentment, and dishonor. Shaw Bros. v. McNeill, 95 N. C., 535; Rasberry v. West, 205 N. C., 406.

We are of opinion that none of tbe appellant’s exceptions to tbe admission or rejection of evidence can be sustained. Upon examination of tbe whole record we find

No error.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shaw Bros. v. McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. Rasberry v. . WestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. H. L. Vollers Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Bratten, Admr. v. McKelveyOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961