Legal Opinion · Dissent

Oscar E. Chytraus Co. v. Wasatch Furnace & Electric, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1972No. 12773Published

1DissentEllett, Justice

I dissent. The statute1 gives protection to “any person who has furnished materials or performed labor for or upon any such building, . . . ” (Emphasis added.)

The plaintiff did not furnish any material to the job. It sold its material to Wasatch Furnace & Electric, Inc., (hereinafter called Wasatch) on open account. It did not collect a sales tax, thus showing clearly that it intended Wasatch to resell the material and to collect and remit the sales tax.2 Even if Wasatch ordered the material delivered to the jobsite, there was no agreement between Chytraus and Wasatch for the material in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crown Roofing & Engineering Co. v. RobinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API