Legal Opinion

Turner v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 2, 1997No. A97A0874PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

On appeal from his rape and aggravated sodomy convictions, Eric Turner claims the destruction of a portion of his trial transcript requires a new trial. He also contends the evidence presented was insufficient to support his convictions. Held:

1. As Turner contends, OCGA § 17-8-5 requires that testimony in felony cases be transcribed. Because a flood destroyed the court reporter’s notes of the testimony of two witnesses, Turner argues *349that the partial absence of the trial transcript effectively deprives him of the right to appeal and requires a new trial. See Wade v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Wade v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  3. Zachary v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Hardy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Barnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glass v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  2. Boone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Glass v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API