Legal Opinion

Pignaz v. Burnett

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1898No. S. F. No. 1184PublishedCited by 1 opinion

MOTION in the Supreme Court to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and also another appeal from an order refusing to restrain the sheriff from executing a writ of assistance. J. C. B. Hebbard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court rendered upon-the present motion, and upon a former motion, reported in Pignaz v. Burnett, 119 Cal. 157.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Motion to dismiss the appeals.

A motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment herein, and also from the. order refusing to set aside a writ of assistance, was heretofore made and denied December %, 1897. (119 Cal. 157.) The facts involved in the present motion are quite-fully stated in" the opinión in that case. The motion to dismiss-the appeal from the judgment was then made upon the ground that the transcript had not been filed within the time prescribed by the rules of this court, and was denied for the reason that *293it was made to appear that a bill of exceptions used on the appeal had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. FreeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API