Legal Opinion · Dissent

MacDougall v. Weichert

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 10, 1996Published

1DissentWilentz, C.J.

There is no clearer general mandate of public policy than the duty of public officials to vote honestly in accordance with their conscience and with due regard for the interests of those they represent. And there is no clearer specific mandate of public policy than the prohibition against bribes and threats that would corrupt their honesty and their vote. In a democracy governed by the vote of elected officials, it is understood and accepted that those officials must vote for what they believe is in the best *408interest of society, and not for their own or another’s economic interest. The Court…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Rutan v. Republican Party of IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API