Redden v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VALIHURA, Justice:
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant below, Tyrone Redden (“Redden”), seeks review of the Superior Court’s September 1, 2015 Order 1 denying his Amended Motion for Postconviction Relief (the “Amended Motion”). At issue in this appeal are two out-of-court statements, introduced at Redden’s trial pursuant to 11 Del. C. § 3507. In his Motion, Redden argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the Section 3507 statements after the State faded to ask each witness whether his or her out-of-court statement was truthful. Redden further argued that his appellate…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Younger v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Benson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
- Burton v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
- Bussey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
- Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.