Housing Authority of Augusta v. Holloway
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Per curiam
The only assignment of error relied on by the' plaintiff in error is uppn the following excerpt from the judge’s charge: “I charge you, gentlemen of the jury, that under the law, where a person has the right of eminent domain as in this case, yon can take the other fellow’s property, but you must give him just and adequate compensation for it; and in this case, gentlemen of the jury, the valuation is not determined by the market value of the property, but it is what was that property, house and lot, when taken, what was the actual value of that property to the owner.” The plaintiff in error…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Harrison v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Elbert County v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hollywood Baptist Church of Rome v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- State Highway Department v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SAVANNAH v. SAVANNAH &C. WORKS, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- HOUSING &C. CITY OF ATLANTA v. TroncalliCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- State Highway Department v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.