Legal Opinion

McKinnon v. Sheffield

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 16, 1919No. 1128PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to reform deed. Before Judge Highsmith. Camden superior court. July 29, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. The doctrine of caveat emptor applies to administrators’ sales. Wells v. Harper, 82 Ga. 194 (6 S. E. 913, 12 Am. St. R. 310); Mercer v. Sager, 129 Ga. 123 (58 S. E. 1037); Thrift v. Baker, 144 Ga. 508 (87 S. E. 676). Therefore the provision of the Civil Code, § 4122, for apportionment of the purchase-price on account of deficiency of acreage in a sale of land where- the purchase is by the acre, has no application to administrators’ sales. Greer v. McDonald, 141 Ga. 309 (80 S. E. 1002).

2. Upon the allegations of the petition as amended and the proposed amendment which was rejected by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thrift Bros. v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Mercer v. SagerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Wells v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  4. Greer v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edenfield v. RountreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Kytle v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API