Legal Opinion

School District v. School District

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1922No. Appeal, No. 46PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 46, March T., 1922, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Wayne Co., March T., 1918, No. 1, on verdict for plaintiff in case of School District of Berlin Township v. School District of Damascus Township. Assumpsit to recover cost of tuition furnished by plaintiff’s school district to pupils living in defendant’s school district. Before Newcomb, J., 45th Judicial District, specially presiding. Verdict for plaintiff for $244.02 and judgment thereon.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 46, March T., 1922, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Wayne Co., March T., 1918, No. 1, on verdict for plaintiff in case of School District of Berlin Township v. School District of Damascus Township. Assumpsit to recover cost of tuition furnished by plaintiff’s school district to pupils living in defendant’s school district. Before Newcomb, J., 45th Judicial District, specially presiding. Verdict for plaintiff for $244.02 and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed. The facts are stated in the following opinion of the court below refusing motions for new trial and for judgment non…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The charge of the court below, taken with its opinion discharging the motion for judgment n. o. v., and the motion for a new trial has clearly and satisfactorily disposed of the question involved in this case, so that it is not necessary to supplement them with additional argument.

The assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lehman Township School District v. Lake Township School District, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API