Legal Opinion

Aikens v. Bishop

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided March 9, 2021No. 1:17-cv-01266Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ANTHONY AIKENS, Plaintiff, v. DECISION AND ORDER 17-CV-1266S TIMOTHY HUNTER and JACOB MONKELBAAN, Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION In this action, pro se Plaintiff Anthony Aikens alleges, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, that Defendants Timothy Hunter and Jacob Monkelbaan violated his First Amendment rights while he was an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (“DOCCS”). In particular, he asserts that Defendants deprived him of his right to the free exercise of religion by denying him…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API