Marshall v. K & W PRODUCTS

OPINION

CHEZEM, Judge.

Case Summary 1

Appellant-Plaintiff, J. John Marshall (“Marshall”) appeals the small claims court’s denial of his motion to correct errors following a judgment that Appellee-Defendant, K & W Products (“K & W”), was liable for a refund of Marshall’s purchase price of K & Ws goods, but not for any consequential damages.

Issue

Marshall raises three issues for our review, but we find the following issue dispositive: whether Marshall’s motion to correct errors was deemed denied, thus making his prae-cipe untimely.

Facts and Procedural History

The facts most favorable to the judgment…