Marion Energy, Inc. v. KFJ Ranch Partnership
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Lee
T 36 As the court today indicates, the statutory term "mineral deposits" is sometimes used narrowly to refer to solid mineral ores and sometimes used broadly to encompass oil and gas reserves. The question presented in this case is which of these two meanings to ascribe to that term as it appears in the eminent domain statute, Utah Code section 78B-6-501(6). I respectfully dissent from the court's resolution of that question on the basis of a "canon" of narrow construction of eminent domain provisions. Instead of falling back on that canon, I would decide which meaning of "mineral deposits"…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge v. Proprietors of the Warren BridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Burke v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.