Legal Opinion
Adams v. Woodbridge Sanitary Pottery Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 12, 1980PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
174 N.J. Super. 284 (1980)
416 A.2d 422
JOHN ADAMS AND MARY ADAMS, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
WOODBRIDGE SANITARY POTTERY CORP., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 29, 1980.
Decided May 12, 1980.
Before Judges MATTHEWS, ARD and POLOW.
James A. Robottom argued the cause for appellant (Haskins, Robottom, Hack, Piro & O'Day, attorneys).
Julius J. Feinson argued the cause for respondents (Mandel, Wysoker, Sherman, Glassner & Weingartner, attorneys).
2Per curiam
The principal question in this appeal is whether the dependent of an employee who dies as the result of a…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Paul v. Baltimore Upholstering Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Roberts v. All American Engineering Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Brown v. General Aniline and Film Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Brown v. General Aniline and Film Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Wright v. Plaza FordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Kibble v. Weeks Dredging & Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Kibble v. Weeks Dredging & Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Kibble v. Weeks Dredging & Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999