Merchant Bank v. Grove Silk Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WATSON, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff filed a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum served by the Defendant upon Fabian Roll, Vice President of the Plaintiff Bank, at 434 Broadway, New York City, New York.
Plaintiff contends, inter alia, that the subpoena is of no force and effect as it is not within 100 miles of the place of trial, Scranton, Pennsylvania.
*440Under Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., a subpoena may be served at a place outside the district provided it is within 100 miles of the place of hearing or trial specified in the subpoena. The distance is to be determined…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jennings v. MenaughU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1902
- Green v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1926
3Cited by8 opinions
- Caryl Chessman v. Harley O. Teets, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Deloro Smelting & Refining Co. v. Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1970
- SCM Corp. v. Xerox Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1977
- Michelman v. Hanil Bank, Ltd. (In Re Jee)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1989
- Penntube Plastics Company v. Fluorotex, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.