Legal Opinion

Walrath v. Whittekind

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Bourbon District Gourt. At the May Term, 1881, of the district court, plaintiff Whittekind had judgment against defendant Walrath, who brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This was an action brought by defendant in error in the district court of Bourbon county to recover for labor and material done and furnished in the improvement and repair of two certain store-rooms in the city of Fort Scott. Defendant in error is a carpenter; plaintiff in error is a dry goods merchant. The case was tried at the May term, 1881, *483of the district court, before a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the defendant in error for $300. After $50 of this amount had been remitted, the district court overruled a motion for a new…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schleider v. DielmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
  2. Dody v. State Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Lehman, Durr & Co. v. PritchettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. Macy v. PeachCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
  5. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. ShookCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API