Legal Opinion

William B. Scaife & Sons Co. v. Driscoll

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 10, 1937No. 6475PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

Upon July 29, 1936, the appellant, a manufacturing corporation doing business in a suburb of Pittsburgh, filed with the collector of internal revenue at Pittsburgh its capital stock return to serve as a basis for capital stock tax and excess profits tax, in which the value of the appellant’s capital stock was stated by it to be $600,000. On the 3rd day of September, 1936, according to the allegations of the bill of complaint, it was discovered by the appellant’s officers, that the statement of valuation made upon the return referred to was incorrect “due to an inadvertent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Oertel Co. v. GlennDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1936

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Scaife Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Keeler v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
  3. Barber v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  4. CH Mead Coal Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  5. Glenn v. Oertel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API