Legal Opinion

Goldman v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 1935No. 1 Div. 211PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

The prosecution was begun by affidavit in the county court, and was in words and figures as follows: “Personally appeared before me, R. L. Gordy, Clerk of the County •Court, in and for said County, H. D. Lynes, ■who being duly sworn on oath, says that (1) Richard Goldman, did kill or attempt to kill a doe, or female deer (2) Richard Goldman did use an artificial light in hunting or killing deer (3) Richard Goldman did hunt on the lands of J. B. Slade without first having obtained from the owner or agent thereof a written permission to do so, against the peace and dignity of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pynes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Lewis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Mitchell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Nelson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tadlock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1969
  2. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API