Ware v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part 1
LYONS, Special Justice
(concurring in part and concurring in the result in part).
I concur in the main opinion insofar as it affirms the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals as to James Lee Ware’s conviction and sentence for rape.'
*422I concur in the result in the main opinion insofar as it reverses the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals as to Ware’s convictions and sentences for first-degree robbery and first-degree burglary. The main opinion and Justice Shaw’s special writing, dissenting from that portion of the main opinion, focus on the sufficiency of the evidence as to the state of…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Moore; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Bolin; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Shaw.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Faircloth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
- Ex Parte FairclothSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Bankston v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Ex Parte WoodallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Powe v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.