Legal Opinion

Hooper, Troy Neal

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 30, 2015No. WR-84,205-01Published

1Opinion of the Court

M ALELAMM"""‘: l - - , ' MFLLZ¢:LG_O \ '/ ' ` _ … %/@Mlblmiam;@” f i‘@_’,@j\(&j W ’M€Z~i@¢>gf,g@ uaw i@z¢M/:;L way 5:?, JLL__~;LJ LZ;XZQ@S:QL)_ .\AM W w L`M/£:vv;/(;d…% /Q@! _QSQM\CYJE' ly ( \@W , __<37,130'5'01‘ - . REcEc\./W\Q/ WT, M_~ nw _* coum 0F cmWPE/M 722/5 5560625\ ‘ -' {2»7)27525(2225 755/2 ._.. 2 557 27 2/;5 5 2255 2557/257 /§/5 7177_'0/0/777 ' vi ' zzg// _ - - _ Zz/{AML{#/ 75 2676/55 man ZéZAIZj/Z$. 554/756 ¢¢LJ/Q~ ‘ 7777 255)51006250070/!/ 522 &)227!02 5225'5( QGOM~ » iAQ.Z{immM-Z/ /! 5 0252, 05720'5/! 55 544 . , . 2275-um 70 525 25 52 2202 222/552 2/ 525/ 222/22222 20 572/5526…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Heath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. City of Newport v. FordCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API