Legal Opinion

Hooks v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1977No. 9790PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAIR, Associate Judge,

Retired:

Appellants Hooks and Mathis were convicted in a jury trial of robbery (D.C.Code 1973, § 22-2901). Three issues are before this court on appeal: (1) whether Hooks was deprived of her Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel because of an alleged ethical conflict affecting her attorney; (2) whether the trial court erred in admitting expert testimony concerning the modus operandi of pickpocket teams; and (3) whether there was sufficient evidence presented at trial to support the convictions. We affirm.

In the afternoon of October 11, 1974, the driver…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  2. Arnold v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. James F. Bolden, United States of America v. George E. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  4. United States Fo America v. Orville J. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. Calhoun v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zanders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. United States v. Eddie J. MathisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  3. Patterson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Miller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. GervaisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API