Legal Opinion

Kissel v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 23, 1975No. 51133PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Webb, Judge.

In this workmen’s compensation case the deputy director, and then the full board, found adversely to the claimant. The superior court affirmed the award. There being sufficient competent evidence to support the award, the judgment of the superior court affirming the award must be affirmed under the "any evidence” rule. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. New, 110 Ga. App. 596 (139 SE2d 343); Adams v. United States F. &. G. Co., 125 Ga. 232, 234 (1) (186 SE2d 784). "We equally apply the any evidence’ rule to claimants as well as to employers.” Continental Cas. Co. v. Weise, 136 Ga. App.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adams v. U. S.. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY v. NewCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. WeiseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arlington Apartments v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Hardee v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. HartlCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Utica Mutual Insurance v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  5. Willis v. Employers Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API