Legal Opinion

Farmer v. Young

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 17, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Madison District Court. — Hon. J. H. Applegate, Judge. Action on the award of fence viewers. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict for the defendant. A motion for a new trial, filed by the plaintiff, was overruled, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

The plaintiff and defendant are the owners of adjoining tracts of land. The plaintiff built a fence one hundred and twenty rods in length on the boundary line between the tracts. He claims that it is the duty of the defendant to pay for or rebuild one-half of it as a partition fence, and submitted the matter to the fence viewers. They found that the defendant should pay the value of one-half the fence, fixed at *383fifteen dollars and costs, and provided that, in case she .should elect to rebuild it, she should rebuild the west part, sixty rods in length. The defendant having refused to pay the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bills v. BelknapSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robert L. Teig v. City of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids City Council, Tiffany O'Donnell, Patrick Loeffler, Marty Hoeger, Ashley Vanorney, Tyler Olson, Ann Poe, Scott Overland, Dale Todd, and Scott Olson, in their Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API